Start
Please give us some feedback on the conference. This is a survey of people who attended the 2015 North American Data Documentation Initiative Conference. Your participation in the survey is completely optional. Your responses will be helpful in evaluating this year's conference and in planning future conferences. Questions about the survey can be addressed to James Doiron at jdoiron@ualberta.ca Thank you for attending the NADDI 2016 conference!
Demographics

Please indicate the reason that DDI/NADDI most interests you.

1
Research use
2
Tool development/programming
3
Libraries/archiving
4
Other

Please indicate the reason that DDI/NADDI most interests you - other, please specify

Text

Please indicate your primary designation/role:

1
Faculty/Academic
2
Student
3
Research staff/support
4
Private sector
5
Other

Please indicate your primary designation/role - other, please specify

Text

Have you attended a NADDI conference previously?

1
Yes
2
No

Where did you first hear about NADDI?

1
Word of mouth
2
Website (i.e., NADDI, DDI Alliance, IASSIST, etc)
3
List serv (i.e., NADDI, DDI Alliance, IASSIST, etc)
4
Other

Where did you first hear about NADDI? - other, please specify

Text
Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied were you with the ...

Location of the conference?

1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Conference facilities?

1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Food options?

1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Registration and check-in?

1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Conference content?

1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

What topics would you like to see addressed in future NADDI conferences?

Text
Workshop Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied were you with each of the following workshops (if you did not attend the workshop or session please mark “Did not attend”):

Documenting and Managing Your Data With Dataverse

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Comments on Documenting and Managing Your Data With Dataverse

Text

Documenting Questionnaires and Datasets with DDI: A hands-on Introduction with Colectica

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Comments on Documenting Questionnaires and Datasets with DDI: A hands-on Introduction with Colectica

Text

Delivering Open Data and Statistics as a Service

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Comments on Delivering Open Data and Statistics as a Service

Text

Documenting Open Data: Metadata for Discovery, Access and Reuse

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Comments on Documenting Open Data: Metadata for Discovery, Access and Reuse

Text
Session Satistfaction
Overall, how satisfied were you with each of the following conference sessions (if you did not attend the workshop or session please mark “Did not attend”):
### Thursday

Keynote address (Lawrence Richer): How do we introduce metadata to researchers and clinicians?

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Premiere of the MIDUS Colectica Portal

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Developing metadata and documentation for the Child Data Centre of Alberta (CDCA), a data sharing platform to facilitate secondary research

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Qualitative Data in DDI Views (DDI4)

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Lessons learned in supporting major longitudinal research projects with metadata, and in using metadata for rules-based data ingestion in a secure data repository

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Bridging the divide between Special Collections and contemporary research data description)

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Hail Data!

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Metadata Requirements for Time-Based Media

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Geospatial content in DDI

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Poster Session: Let's Interoperate!

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
### Friday

Closing plenary (Larry Hoyle)

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

MTNA-RDS: Metadata Powered Statistical Data as a Service

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

DDI Website Renewal: The good, the bad, and the ugly

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Supporting different flavours of DDI in odesi: An overview of metadata from two data repository systems

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

A Reusable Web Portal for Complex Data

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Metadata Management in JSON

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Using DDI and Colectica to document the US Consumer Expenditure Survey

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Ensuring Long Term Access to Quality Data: A DDI-based Curation System

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Conclusion

Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?

1
Yes
2
No

Do you have any other suggestions for the future of this conference?

Text
End
Please give us some feedback on the conference. This is a survey of people who attended the 2015 North American Data Documentation Initiative Conference. Your participation in the survey is completely optional. Your responses will be helpful in evaluating this year's conference and in planning future conferences. Questions about the survey can be addressed to James Doiron at jdoiron@ualberta.ca Thank you for attending the NADDI 2016 conference!

Demographics

Please indicate the reason that DDI/NADDI most interests you.
1
Research use
2
Tool development/programming
3
Libraries/archiving
4
Other
Please indicate the reason that DDI/NADDI most interests you - other, please specify
Text
Please indicate your primary designation/role:
1
Faculty/Academic
2
Student
3
Research staff/support
4
Private sector
5
Other
Please indicate your primary designation/role - other, please specify
Text
Have you attended a NADDI conference previously?
1
Yes
2
No
Where did you first hear about NADDI?
1
Word of mouth
2
Website (i.e., NADDI, DDI Alliance, IASSIST, etc)
3
List serv (i.e., NADDI, DDI Alliance, IASSIST, etc)
4
Other
Where did you first hear about NADDI? - other, please specify
Text

Overall Satisfaction

Overall, how satisfied were you with the ...
Location of the conference?
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Conference facilities?
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Food options?
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Registration and check-in?
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Conference content?
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
What topics would you like to see addressed in future NADDI conferences?
Text

Workshop Satisfaction

Overall, how satisfied were you with each of the following workshops (if you did not attend the workshop or session please mark “Did not attend”):
Documenting and Managing Your Data With Dataverse
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Comments on Documenting and Managing Your Data With Dataverse
Text
Documenting Questionnaires and Datasets with DDI: A hands-on Introduction with Colectica
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Comments on Documenting Questionnaires and Datasets with DDI: A hands-on Introduction with Colectica
Text
Delivering Open Data and Statistics as a Service
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Comments on Delivering Open Data and Statistics as a Service
Text
Documenting Open Data: Metadata for Discovery, Access and Reuse
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Comments on Documenting Open Data: Metadata for Discovery, Access and Reuse
Text

Session Satistfaction

Overall, how satisfied were you with each of the following conference sessions (if you did not attend the workshop or session please mark “Did not attend”):
### Thursday
Keynote address (Lawrence Richer): How do we introduce metadata to researchers and clinicians?
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Premiere of the MIDUS Colectica Portal
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Developing metadata and documentation for the Child Data Centre of Alberta (CDCA), a data sharing platform to facilitate secondary research
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Qualitative Data in DDI Views (DDI4)
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Lessons learned in supporting major longitudinal research projects with metadata, and in using metadata for rules-based data ingestion in a secure data repository
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Bridging the divide between Special Collections and contemporary research data description)
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Hail Data!
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Metadata Requirements for Time-Based Media
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Geospatial content in DDI
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Poster Session: Let's Interoperate!
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
### Friday
Closing plenary (Larry Hoyle)
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
MTNA-RDS: Metadata Powered Statistical Data as a Service
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
DDI Website Renewal: The good, the bad, and the ugly
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Supporting different flavours of DDI in odesi: An overview of metadata from two data repository systems
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
A Reusable Web Portal for Complex Data
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Metadata Management in JSON
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Using DDI and Colectica to document the US Consumer Expenditure Survey
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied
Ensuring Long Term Access to Quality Data: A DDI-based Curation System
0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Conclusion

Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
1
Yes
2
No
Do you have any other suggestions for the future of this conference?
Text
Label

NADDI 2016