Variable Description

Name
good_value
Label
Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
Value Label Frequency % of valid % of all
NaN 4
12.90 %
11.43 %
1 Yes 31
100.00 %
88.57 %
Valid Invalid Min Max Mean StdDev
31 4 1 1 1 0

Representation

Type
Code List
Selection Style
SelectOne
Role
input
Aggregation Method
Unspecified
Temporal
False
Geographic
False

Source Questions

good_value

41 questions before...

Wrap-up and evaluation

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?

1
Yes
2
No

How likely is it that you would recommend the NADDI conference to a colleague?

Note: Please make this a scale, 1 through 10.

Numeric
1 questions after...
View the complete instrument
43 questions before...

Ensuring Long Term Access to Quality Data: A DDI-based Curation System

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?

1
Yes
2
No

Do you have any other suggestions for the future of this conference?

Text
View the complete instrument
35 questions before...

Plenary Session: Conference Wrap-Up and Future of NADDI

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?

1
Yes
2
No

Do you have any other suggestions for the future of this conference?

Text
View the complete instrument
39 questions before...

The DDI4 Collections Pattern

0
Did Not Attend
1
Very Dissatisfied
2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
3
Neutral
4
Somewhat Satisfied
5
Very Satisfied

Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?

1
Yes
2
No

How likely is it that you would recommend the NADDI conference to a colleague?

Note: Please make this a scale, 1 through 10.

Numeric
1 questions after...
View the complete instrument

Lineage

  • Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
    • NADDI 2019 Post Conference Evaluation - good_value
      Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?

Concordance

2013
good_value
2015
good_value
2018
good_value
yes
100.00 %
Yes
100.00 %
80.00 %
no
No
20.00 %
2013
good_value
2015
good_value
2018
good_value
yes
94.29 %
Yes
88.57 %
20.00 %
no
No
5.00 %
Dataset Variable Valid Invalid Min First Quartile Median Third Quartile Max Mean StdDev
2013 good_value 33 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
  • Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
2015 good_value 31 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
  • Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
    • NADDI 2019 Post Conference Evaluation - Question
2018 good_value 5 15 1 1 1 1.33 2 1.2 0.45
  • Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
2013
good_value
2015
good_value
2018
good_value
yes 1
Yes 1 1
no 2
No 2 2
  • Conference was a good value
    • Conference provides a good value
      • Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
      • Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
      • Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?