Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?

Variable Description

Name
good_value
Label
Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
Dataset
NADDI2013Evaluation
Value Label Frequency % of valid % of all
NaN 2
6.06 %
5.71 %
1 yes 33
100.00 %
94.29 %
Valid Invalid Min Max Mean StdDev
33 2 1 1 1 0

Representation

Type
Code List
Selection Style
SelectOne
Role
input
Aggregation Method
Unspecified
Temporal
False
Geographic
False

Lineage

  • 2013 - good_value
    Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?

Concordance

2013
good_value
2015
good_value
2018
good_value
yes
100.00 %
Yes
100.00 %
80.00 %
no
No
20.00 %
2013
good_value
2015
good_value
2018
good_value
yes
94.29 %
Yes
88.57 %
20.00 %
no
No
5.00 %
Dataset Variable Valid Invalid Min First Quartile Median Third Quartile Max Mean StdDev
2013 good_value 33 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
  • 2013 - good_value
    Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
2015 good_value 31 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
  • 2015 - good_value
    Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
    • NADDI 2019 Post Conference Evaluation - Question
2018 good_value 5 15 1 1 1 1.33 2 1.2 0.45
  • 2018 - good_value
    Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
2013
good_value
2015
good_value
2018
good_value
yes 1
Yes 1 1
no 2
No 2 2
  • good_value
    Conference was a good value
    • good_value
      Conference provides a good value
      • 2015 - good_value
        Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
      • 2018 - good_value
        Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?
      • 2013 - good_value
        Do you feel that the NADDI conference was a good value?