Food options?

Variable Description

Name
food
Label
Food options?
Dataset
NADDI2018Evaluation
Value Label Frequency % of valid % of all
NaN 1
5.26 %
5.00 %
2 Dissatisfied 1
5.26 %
5.00 %
3 Neutral 2
10.53 %
10.00 %
4 Satisfied 4
21.05 %
20.00 %
5 Very Satisfied 12
63.16 %
60.00 %
Valid Invalid Min Max Mean StdDev
19 1 2 5 4.42 0.9

Representation

Type
Code List
Selection Style
SelectOne
Role
input
Aggregation Method
Unspecified
Temporal
False
Geographic
False
Represented Variable
Food options?

Lineage

Concordance

22.533.544.55
Food rating2013food2015food2017food2018food2019food
2013
food
2015
food
2016
food
2017
food
2018
food
2019
food
Very Dissatisfied
3.85 %
Dissatisfied
2.86 %
2.94 %
5.26 %
Neutral
5.88 %
19.23 %
7.69 %
10.53 %
Satisfied
37.14 %
47.06 %
38.46 %
23.08 %
21.05 %
Very Satisfied
60.00 %
44.12 %
38.46 %
69.23 %
63.16 %
2013
food
2015
food
2016
food
2017
food
2018
food
2019
food
Very Dissatisfied
3.85 %
Dissatisfied
2.86 %
2.86 %
5.00 %
Neutral
5.71 %
19.23 %
7.32 %
10.00 %
Satisfied
37.14 %
45.71 %
38.46 %
21.95 %
20.00 %
Very Satisfied
60.00 %
42.86 %
38.46 %
65.85 %
60.00 %
Dataset Variable Valid Invalid Min First Quartile Median Third Quartile Max Mean StdDev
2013 food 35 0 2 4 5 5 5 4.54 0.66
2015 food 34 1 2 4 4 5 5 4.32 0.73
2016 food 26 0 1 5 4.08 0.98
2017 food 39 2 3 4 5 5 5 4.62 0.63
2018 food 19 1 2 4 5 5 5 4.42 0.9
2019 food 20 4 2 4 4 4.58 5 3.95 0.89
2013
food
2015
food
2016
food
2017
food
2018
food
2019
food
Very Dissatisfied 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dissatisfied 2 2 2 2 2 2
Neutral 3 3 3 3 3 3
Satisfied 4 4 4 4 4 4
Very Satisfied 5 5 5 5 5 5